A November ny State casino referendum for voters has one attorney questioning the ballot’s wording
In November, New York voters are scheduled to vote on a referendum that would enable several new casino resorts to be built throughout the state. But if one Brooklyn lawyer is successful, that referendum will be halted due to language into the ballot question that he claims violates state legislation.
Referendum Language Questioned
The language in the referendum carries a range ‚legislative purposes‘ that paint the proposition in an unmistakably positive light. For instance, the question mentions ‚promoting work growth, increasing aid to schools and permitting regional governments to lower property taxes.‘ That language was authorized by hawaii Board of Elections in July.
But now, attorney Eric J. Snyder is contending that the language in the bill violates New York legislation. According to a lawsuit filed in the ny State Supreme Court, Snyder alleges that the language violates the continuing State Constitution’s prohibition on the use of public profit the aid of ‚private undertakings.‘
‚The Constitution is pretty clear that you can’t use public cash to sway or influence a vote,‘ Snyder said.
Snyder isn’t the only one who has had up issues with the language in the referendum. Many government watchdog groups also notice it as one-sided, and religious teams have also noted the language used when telling parishioners to „Ny Casino Voter Referendum Wording Challenged by Attorney“ weiterlesen